The High Court of Delhi disposed of a continuation petition as infructuous because the respondents had made the required compliance.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
R.N SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Mr. Arjun Gadhoke, Advocates
Versus
DURGA SHANKAR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 03.12.2018
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous as compliance has been made by respondents.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
DECEMBER 03, 2018
p’ma
R.N SRIVASTAVA
DURGA SHANKAR & ORS
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
