Disposal of a contempt petition (Cont.Cas(C) 483/2018) seeking permission to withdraw. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn in terms of the petitioner's statement, granting liberty as prayed. Related petition involves Tata Sky Ltd and TRAI.
liberty to file appropriate application for interim injunction/relief in W.P.(C) No. 4135/2017
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
TATA SKY LTD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mukul Rohtagi & Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocates with Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Niyati Kohli, Mr. Chaitanya Safaya and Mr. Karan, Advocates.
versus
SUNIL K GUPTA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Saket Singh and Mr. Arjun, Advocates for TRAI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 04.07.2018
After some hearing, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present contempt petition and states that they would be filing an appropriate application for interim injunction/relief in Writ Petition (C) No. 4135/2017, Tata Sky Limited and Another versus Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Another.
Dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the statement with liberty as prayed for.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JULY 04, 2018 MR/NA
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tata Sky Limited and Another versus Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and AnotherReferred¶9
W.P.(C) No. 4135/2017
Tata Sky Ltd
Sunil K Gupta
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
