Madhur Parakh v. Amit Mehta
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dismissing a writ petition and an application after seeking permission to withdraw and the petitioner's counsel seeking leave. No substantive ruling on legal merits.
What the court decided
$~33-FM
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 567/2018
M ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate with petitioner in person versus A ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Paranjan Chopra and Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocates with respondent in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 17.05.2018
CM(M) 567/2018
After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
CM APPL. No. 20735/2018
Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M .
- respondent
A .
Coram
J.R. MIDHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court