Petitioner sought to withdraw a revision petition challenging the rejection of his plaint with liberty to file an appeal, due to a preliminary objection on maintainability.
Application allowed; C.R.P. 4/2018 dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
INDU ROHATGI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Rohatgi, Ms.Bhavna Arora, Advocates
versus
PAWAN KUMAR JAIN & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R
% 16.05.2018 CM Appln. 20332/2018
parties on merits. The parties are at liberty to urge their contentions before the Appellate Court.
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 16, 2018 dk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a revision petition can be maintainable when the challenged order is a decree requiring an appeal.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Indu Rohatgi
Pawan Kumar Jain
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
