The High Court dismissed the petition as frivolous, noting the petitioner's lack of vigilance in prosecuting the case, and awarded costs of Rs. 20,000.
Petition dismissed with costs of Rs. 20,000 to be deposited with Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
VIJAY BHUSHAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Advocate
versus
RAHUL SHAMRA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 18.05.2018
The grievances expressed by the petition at hand are wholly frivolous. The copies of the proceedings which have been filed are replete with instances of petitioner himself not being vigilant and diligent in prosecuting the case. So much so reply to the application for amendment which was filed prior to 18.01.2018 was filed two months thereafter on 17.03.2018. Since the application for amendment of the pleadings had come, there was no occasion for the trial court to give primacy to the application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC which may have been filed earlier.
The petition is dismissed with costs of Rs. 20,000/- to be deposited with Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within a week.
R.K.GAUBA, J
MAY 18, 2018 nk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grievances expressed by the petitioner are frivolous.
VIJAY BHUSHAN SHARMA
RAHUL SHAMRA & ANR
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
