Raju v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants bail to the petitioner in a FIR under Sections 308/323 IPC. The petitioner, already under interim anticipatory bail, is ordered to join investigation. Bail is to be allowed on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety if arrested when the charge sheet is filed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 with one surety of like amount.
What the court decided
$~15
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1368/2017 RAJU ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ashish Upadhyay, Adv.
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
- % 10.01.2018
Petitioner is enjoying interim protection since 31.7.2017. FIR has been registered under Sections 308/323 of the IPC. Petitioner has joined investigation. It is stated on behalf of the State that charge sheet is ready and the same shall be filed within two weeks. Petitioner will continue to join the investigation as and when summoned by the Investigating Officer. The fact that the petitioner has not misused the anticipatory protection granted to him till date and the charge sheet will be filed within the aforenoted period, in the event of arrest petitioner be admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner who has been enjoying interim anticipatory bail and has not misused the protection.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raju
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court