This order held the writ petition infructuous in light of subsequent related proceedings between the Central Bank of India and others. The petition was disposed of with no specific relief detailed beyond the status of being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C.S. Vaidynathan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Debarshi Dutta and Mr. Rajat Pradhan, Advocates.
Versus
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 12.07.2018
Counsel for the parties state that the claim of the Central Bank of India against Petronet VK Limited has been disposed of and decided. Our attention is drawn to order dated 18th May, 2018, passed in W.P. (C) No.1062/2018, Petronet VK Limited Vs. Central Bank of India and Ors. and order dated 3rd July, 2018 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in Appeal No.39/2016, Standard Chartered Bank Vs. Central Bank of India & Anr.
In view of the aforesaid position, counsel for the parties state that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous. The effect thereof would be that the petitioner herein would be entitled to return of the demand draft.
Recording the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
JULY 12, 2018 NA
Reliance Industries Limited
Standard Chartered Bank
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
