Petitioner withdrew writ petition; court dismissed it, directing Collector to consider pending reference application expeditiously if any.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain & Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Mr.J.P.Singh, Adv. for DMRC/R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R
Mr.B.S.Maan, counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw this petition. He, however, complains that the reference has not been forwarded by the Collector to the Court of Additional District Judge. Mr.Jain, counsel for the LAC/L&B submits that he has no instructions as to whether any reference application is pending or not.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In case a reference petition is pending, Collector would consider the request of the petitioner expeditiously.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
JULY 13, 2018 rb /
Shivraj Krishna Gupta
Govt of NCT of Delhi
G.S.Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
