State Bank of India v. Sagdev Sharma and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:15.10.2024 16:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
.Jr
ORDER %. 11.07.2018
While arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner acceptsthatthe impugnedorder is appealable.
In view of the said position,we are not inclinedto entertainthe presentwritpetitionsand give libertyto thepetitionerto take recourse to appellate remedy.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are not entertained, without expressingany opinion on merits. The petitionsare disposedof All the pendingapplicationsare also disposedof.
c SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDWSHEKHAR, J JULY 11, 2018 tP,
SANJIV KHANNA
CHAND SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court