The court declined to entertain writ petitions as counsel accepted the appealability of the impugned order. Liberty was granted to pursue appellate remedy without expressing an opinion on merits.
Liberty granted to pursue appellate remedy; writ petitions and pending applications disposed of without opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:15.10.2024 16:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
.Jr
ORDER %. 11.07.2018
While arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner acceptsthatthe impugnedorder is appealable.
In view of the said position,we are not inclinedto entertainthe presentwritpetitionsand give libertyto thepetitionerto take recourse to appellate remedy.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are not entertained, without expressingany opinion on merits. The petitionsare disposedof All the pendingapplicationsare also disposedof.
c SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDWSHEKHAR, J JULY 11, 2018 tP,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be entertained when the learned counsel accepts that the impugned order is appealable.
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDRASHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
