The petitioner's resignation was accepted by the competent authority via an order dated 07.05.2018. The High Court held that no further adjudication was necessary and disposed of the writ petition along with pending applications.
No further adjudication; petition disposed of along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5.
DR. VISHAL ANAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. Puneesh Grover, Advocates.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashutosh Ghade and Mr. Nikhil Goel, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI O R D E R % 15.05.2018
HIMA KOHLI, J
PRATIBHA RANI, J
MAY 15, 2018 na
DR. VISHAL ANAND
UNION OF INDIA
HIMA KOHLI
PRATIBHA RANI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
