Petitioner sought permission to withdraw a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition including reply and documents filed by respondents and DRT order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
versus
KARUR VYSYA BANK AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, which would include reply and documents filed by the first and the second respondent, as well as the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. All the pending applications are also dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
JULY 13, 2018 tp
SMT. KANCHAN WAHI
KARUR VYSYA BANK
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
