The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner's grievance regarding the Bills of Entry had been redressed by a speaking order.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
It is stated that the petitioner‟s grievance has been redressed and a speaking order made on the Bills of Entry in question.
In these circumstances, the claim has been rendered infructuous, the writ petition is disposed of as such.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
JULY 16, 2018 nn
Rainbow Fashions
The Deputy Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
