The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition as the matter was settled. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14.
VIKRAM BAKSHI & COMPANY PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Pallav Saxena, Advocate.
versus
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 13.07.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition as the matter has been settled/compromised.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
JULY 13, 2018 VKR
VIKRAM BAKSHI & COMPANY PVT. LTD.
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. & ORS.
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
