Petitioner was permitted to withdraw the public interest litigation without prejudice to the remedy sought, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the present petition without prejudice to remedy sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
versus TEHSILDAR, (PUNJABI BAGH) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dalip Mehra, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Shivani Vij, Advocate for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 16.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition without prejudice to remedy sought in the petition.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
The present petition is disposed of accordingly.
I.S.MEHTA, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018/ nd
Om Parkash
Tehsildar, (Punjabi Bagh)
I.S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
