Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to raise the issue before the Special Task Force and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr.Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA Mr.Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advocate for R-3, R-4 & R-5. Mr.Diwankar Sethi, Advocate for Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for SDMC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 14.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise the present issue before the Special Task Force.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise the present issue before the concerned authority, as per law.
The present petition is disposed of accordingly.
Copy of this order be given dasti .
I.S.MEHTA, J
sr
NOVEMBER 14, 2018
Hoshiyar Singh
Delhi Development Authority
I. S. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
