Dismissed

Kirti Sav Jan Kalyan Samiti (Regd.) v. S. D. M. (Yamuna Vihar)

Delhi HC16 Nov 2018W.P.(C)/12077/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction under Article 226 to stop alleged unauthorized construction by Respondents 4-6. The Court took note of a demolition notice issued by Respondent 2 and disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner to approach the Special Task Force if dissatisfied.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed. Petitioner at liberty to approach the Special Task Force if not satisfied with this direction.

Kirti Sav Jan Kalyan Samiti (Regd.) Vs S. D. M… — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12077/2018 & CM APPL. 46784-46785/2018

¶4

KIRTI SAV JAN KALYAN SAMITI (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.M. Hashmi and Mr. Rukhsar Ahmad, Advocates along with the petitioner. versus

¶5

S. D. M. (YAMUNA VIHAR) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Niddhi Raman, Advocate for R-1 and R-3 with SI Shailendra Kumar Singh, PS- Gokulpuri, Delhi. Mr. Shitij Vats, Advocate for R-2. Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate with Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Mr. Amit Prakash Shahi, Advocates for R-4. Mr. Abdol S. Advocate for R-6.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R

¶8

% 16.11.2018

¶9

The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 226 for issuance of direction to respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 for stopping the illegal construction carrying out by respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6.

¶10

The petitioner has alleged that one Gaurav Jain – respondent No.4 is carrying out unauthorised construction as shown in Annexure-E Khasra No.1/2, Ziauddinpur, New Mustafabad, Delhi situated in the Revenue Estate of village Ziauddinpur, Opp. Kabristan Gate, New Mustafabad, Delhi110094.

¶11

Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate puts appearance on behalf of respondent

¶12

No.4 and submitted that Gaurav Jain i.e. respondent No.4 is the owner in possession of the land bearing Khasra No. 1/1, Property No.3502, Village Ziauddinpur Main, 33 feet Road, Mustafabad, Shahdara, New Delhi-110094 and there is no unauthorised construction on his part.

¶13

Learned counsel for respondent No.4 has further submitted that the petitioner has got no locus standi and is in the habit of filing false complaints without looking into the fact, that the petitioner is raising the construction at his own land i.e. Khasra No. 1/1, Property No.3502, Village Ziauddinpur Main, 33 feet Road, Mustafabad, Shahdara, New Delhi-110094 and has also placed on record a photocopy of the sale deed.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 has filed status report and submitted that the respondent No.2 has already issued demolition notice being Notice No.15942 dated 30.10.2018 to which counsel for the respondent No.4 denied having been served on his client till date.

¶15

In these circumstance, respondent No.2 may take appropriate action as per law on the Khasra No.1/2, Ziauddinpur, New Mustafabad, Delhi.

¶16

In any event, if the petitioner is not satisfied with this direction, he is at liberty to approach to the Special concerned Task Force.

¶17

The present petition is disposed of. All the pending application are also disposed of.

¶18

Dasti.

¶19

I.S.MEHTA, J

¶20

NOVEMBER 16, 2018 nd

Kirti Sav Jan Kalyan Samiti (Regd.) v. S. D. M. (Yamuna Vihar)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kirti Sav Jan Kalyan Samiti (Regd.) v. S. D. M. (Yamuna Vihar)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India Vs Dr H P Singh

UOI & Ors. Vs Cental Administrative Tribunal

Kamlesh Sharma Vs UOI

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Ashok Kumar Garg

Sanjay Kumar Bhambri Vs Union of India & Anr.

Smt. Shashi Bala Raghav Vs National Thermal Power Corporation (N.T.P.C) and Anr.

Angelic Creations through Its Proprietor Sh. Gaurav Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of (Drawback) & Anr.

Hazara Singh Vs Delhi Devlopment Authority

Hoshiyar Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority and Ors.

Wakil Ahmad Vs M/S Gammon India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Raj Kumar & Anr. Vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.

Satender Sharma Vs M/S Shriram General Insurance Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Om Parkash Vs Tehsildar, (Punjabi Bagh) & Anr.

Nanbabu Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.