Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to approach the Financial Commissioner. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise the issue before the Financial Commissioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Through: Mr.S.Premchandra, Advocate
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Ms.Urvashi Tripathi and Ms.Sukriti Ghai, Advocate for R- 1 & R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA O R D E R % 16.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise the present issue before the Financial Commissioner.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise the present issue before the Financial Commissioner, in accordance with law.
The present petition is disposed of accordingly.
I.S.MEHTA, J
NOVEMBER 16, 2018
sr
NANBABU
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
I.S.MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
