Dismissed
Ram Phal Verma v. Scooter India Ltd.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/5935/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
RAM PHAL VERMA ..... Petitioner Through: Ms.Isha Khanna, Advocate with Ms.Anam Ahmed, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
SCOOTER INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jagat Arora, Advocate with Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 07.05.2018
Arguments heard.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn but liberty may be granted to the petitioner to seek their other remedy available in accordance with law as observed by the court while deciding their WP(C) No.1261750/2006 on 23.05.2007.
In the circumstances, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty.
Order dasti.
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 07, 2018
“shailendra”
Ram Phal Verma
Scooter India Ltd.
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court