Dismissed
Ruchir Mittal v. Ministry of H.R.D. and Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1243/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
RUCHIR MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Nemo
versus
MINISTRY OF H.R.D. AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal and Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Advocates for respondents No. 3 and 4
Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel for respondent Central Government
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 04.05.2018
Learned counsel for respondents No. 3 and 4 submits that in view of decision in W.P.(C) 11598/2017, this petition is required to be dismissed.
Since none appears on behalf of petitioner even in the post-lunch session today, therefore, this petition and the applications are dismissed in default.
(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE
MAY 04, 2018 v
Ruchir Mittal
Ministry of H.R.D.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court