A petition seeking direction to de-seal premises was dismissed as withdrawn after counsel accepted that the petitioner should approach the Supreme Court, following a Supreme Court order on sealing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
RAM GOPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K. Dhariwal, Adv.
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Trisha Nagpal, Adv. for Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC for R1. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Standing Counsel for R2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
O R D E R % 04.05.2018
CM. No. 18139/2018 (for exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM. No. 18140/2018 (for delay)
This is an application filed by the applicant / petitioner seeking condonation of 50 days delay in re-filing the petition.
For the reasons stated in the application delay of 50 days in re-filing the petition is condoned.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 4716/2018
Present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:
“It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may graciously be pleased to:
Mr. Gaurang Kanth, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 / EDMC states, sealing has been effected in view of the order passed by the Supreme Court in the case of M.C. Mehta v. Union of India . He states, appropriate for the petitioner is to approach the Supreme Court even for desealing of the property.
On this, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition to approach the Supreme Court.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
MAY 04, 2018 /jg
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow exemption to re-file the petition considering a delay.
Whether to pass an order directing desealing of premises.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
M.C. Mehta v. Union of IndiaReferred¶24
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India
RAM GOPAL SINGH
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
EDMC
V. KAMESWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
