Disposed
M/S Vibhor Marketing (P) Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3431/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
M/S VIBHOR MARKETING (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: None.
versus
ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
% 02.05.2018
VINOD GOEL, J.
MAY 02, 2018
“sandeep”
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to a further four weeks' time to deposit the due amount given the order below?
Whether correcting an error in the impugned judgment to reinstate the time granted is justified in the interest of justice?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S VIBHOR MARKETING (P) LTD.
ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court