The High Court granted the petitioner leave to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn, disposing of the pending applications accordingly.
Leave granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
SASI POWER PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Basant Agrawal, Advocate with Mr. Shankar Karjee, AR
versus
UCO BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Chauhan and Mr. Amresh Mathur, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R
% 18.05.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
Leave granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
MAY 18, 2018 dn
SASI POWER PRIVATE LIMITED
UCO BANK
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
DEEPA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
