This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
D.S. CARGO AGENCY ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Anjali J Manish & Ms. Nidhi Saini, Advs Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL),NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Amit Bansal & Mr. Akhil Kulshrestha, Advs
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 14.05.2018
Learned counsel for respondent, who appears on an advance notice, states that the impugned order dated 13th March, 2018 is appealable before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
After some hearing, learned counsel appearing for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and states that she will avail of other statutory remedies available by filing an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. She also states that she would be filing an application seeking stay.
We take the statement on record and dismiss the present writ petition
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, without making any comments on merits.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 14, 2018/ SM
D.S. CARGO AGENCY
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEW DELHI
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
