The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of BSF orders finding him guilty of charges and turning down his representation to cancel punishment, filed seven years after the original order. The Court dismissed the petition in limine due to inordinate delay and lack of justification.
None granted; petition dismissed in limine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3.
MR. SUDHISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Shaleel Sarwar Wani, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL (BSF) AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Suman Chauhan, Advocate with DC Vinod Kumar, Law, BSF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 30.07.2018
W.P.(C) 4779/2018
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
JULY 30, 2018 na/rkb
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 4779/2018
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition filed after a seven-year delay given that the cause of action arose on 24.06.2011.
Whether the petitioner's claim of a continuing cause of action justifies the belated approach to the Court for quashing orders.
Whether the petitioner's failure to approach the Court within a reasonable period of time renders the petition hopelessly belated.
Mr. Sudhish Kumar
Director General (BSF) and Ors.
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
