Pending writ petition was withdrawn by the petitioner after admission of false averment regarding prior litigation in Calcutta High Court, which Court had dismissed it for default.
little so the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
RAVI KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus
DIRECTOR GENERAL CISF AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. B.S. Shukla, Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocates with Mr. Devendra Singh, AC,CISF.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 27.07.2018
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(C) 7803/2018
W.P.(C) 7803/2018
Page 2 of 3
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
JULY 27, 2018 ap/rkb
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(C) 7803/2018
Ravi Kumar
Director General CISF
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
