Petitioner challenged non-disbursement of benefits under the ACPD Scheme. Bench recorded respondent's assurance to release amounts within four weeks, disposing of the petition as nothing survived adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
RAJENDRA PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Bhanu Gupta, Adv. for Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R
WP(C) No.2092/2018 Page No.1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
JULY 27, 2018/aa
Page No.2 of 2
WP(C) No.2092/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the accrued benefits under the Allowed City Personnel (ACPD) Scheme given the respondent's assurance of release.
RAJENDRA PRASAD
UNION OF INDIA
HIMA KOHLI
REKHA PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
