The petitioner withdrew a seniority-related constitutional petition after the respondents issued an order revising the petitioner's seniority list regardless of the court intervention.
The petition was disposed of as not pressed on the withdrawal of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
DR. VIVEK KUMAR MATHUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhiber, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Hari Shankar Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 01.08.2018
W.P.(C) 3660/2018
Page 1 of 2
HIMA KOHLI, J
REKHA PALLI, J
AUGUST 01, 2018 ap/rkb
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 3660/2018
Dr. Vivek Kumar Mathur
Union of India
Hima Kohli
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
