This single-paragraph order notes that the petitioner's counsel had instructions not to press the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as not pressed. No substantive legal principle is articulated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
LAKKAVARAPUKOTA NAVYA AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Azeem Samuel, Adv.
versus
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIS AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Nikhil Goel with Mr. Gurpreet Hora & Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 07, 2018/ak
Lakkavarapukota Navya and Anr.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Anr.
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
