HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
Petition disposed based on respondent's statement; stay on disabled director list; DIN & DSC activated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr. Kanishk Arora, Advocates for R-1 & R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
% 04.05.2018
“1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the defaulting company i. e. Tarz Support Services Private Ltd. had on its Board two Directors i.e. the writ petitioner herein (Mr. Arun Kapoor) and another person by the name of Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after Mr. Sachin Dev Sharma took steps to avail of the benefit of the CODS-20 18 his name was removed from the impugned list of disqualified directors. It is stated that insofar as the petitioner is concerned, his name has not been excluded from the said list.
3. Mr. Kanishk who appears for the official respondents states that he will obtain instructions in the matter.
4. List on 4th May, 201 8. ”
W.P.(C) 4532/2018 Page 1 of 2
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 04, 2018 A
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 4532/2018
Arun Kapoor
Union of India
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
