Dismissed

Dr. Varghese Antony v. National Board of Examination & Anr.

Delhi HC14 May 2018W.P.(C)/3383/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a one-line order disposing of a writ petition wherein respondent counsel assured production of documents and submission of facts. No substantive adjudication on the merits of the petitioner's claim was rendered.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed alongwith pending application as respondent assured production of documents; no further adjudication.

Dr. Varghese Antony Vs National Board of Examination… — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~27

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 3383/2018 & C.M.No.14185/2018

¶4

DR. VARGHESE ANTONY ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through Mr.Shinoj K.Narayanan with Mr.Honey Khanna, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION & ANR

¶8

..... Respondent

¶9

Through Mr.Kirtiman Singh with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advs for R-1. Mr.Raja Chatterjee with Mr.Piyush Sachdev, Advs for R-2.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶11

O R D E R % 14.05.2018

¶12

Mr.Raja Chatterjee, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of respondent no.2 and submits that he has instructions to state that respondent no.2 will produce the original documents in respect of the petitioner before Ms.Kamlesh Chakravarty, Assistant Director, Counselling and Registration Section of respondent no.1 within one week from today, who will after examining the same and satisfying herself return the same to the authorised representative of the respondent no.2.

¶13

It is made clear, in case, Ms.Kamlesh Chakravarty, retain the said documents for any verification, she will inform the authorised

¶14

representative of respondent no.2 the date on which the authorised representative of respondent no.2 is required to visit the office of respondent no.1 to collect back the documents.

¶15

It is further directed that, in case, the documents of the petitioner are found to be correct, the seat allotted to the petitioner on 10.04.2018 in the counselling would be treated as final.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 also assures the Court that the date and time on which the officer of the respondent no.2 will approach respondent no.1, would also communicated to the petitioner through counsel, so as to enable the petitioner to also remain present before respondent no.1.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent no.2, nothing further survive for adjudication in the present petition and the same is accordingly dismissed alongwith pending application.

¶18

Dasti under the signature of Court Master.

¶19

REKHA PALLI, J

¶20

MAY 14, 2018 sr

Dr. Varghese Antony v. National Board of Examination & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Varghese Antony v. National Board of Examination & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fci Handling Workers Union Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dr.Soobrat Roy Vs T.K.Banarjee & Ors.

Umesh Garg Vs Union Bank of India

Indrajit Deb Vs UOI & Ors.

M/S Six Dee Telecom Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Central Board of Trustees, E.P.F. Organization

Jaswant Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gajraj Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

K.D. College of Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Vikas Bhaskar Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

Samrat Ray and Ors. Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs University of Delhi and Anr.

Sanjeev Singla Vs the Prinipal, Shah Internationa School and Ors.

Gyan Vigyan Krida Vikas Sanstha Vs All India Council for Technical Education and Ors.

Aryan College of Education and Anr. Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.