Disposed
Shiv Trading Company v. Commissioner of Vat & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1724/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
versus COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC with Mr. Ahmed Said Adv., Mr. Rajesh Shukla, VATO and Ms. Rajni, LA
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
Learned counsel for the respondents states that refund order dated 07.05.2018 has been passed and copy of the said order has been furnished to the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that refund has not been paid.
The respondents would pay refund within two weeks from today failing which the petitioner would be entitled to revive the present writ petition and ask for costs.
On the question of interest, the order dated 07.05.2018 states that no interest has been issued in view of stay granted in Special Leave Petition in the case of Commissioner, Trade & Taxes and Anr. vs. Vizien Organics . It is also stated that interest would be granted in terms of the decision of the Supreme Court. The said statement is
taken on record.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of on the aforesaid terms and without any order as to costs.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
MAY 08, 2018 b
Shiv Trading Company
Commissioner of VAT
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court