Petitioner failed to appear; Customs goods were seized with provisional release passed. Writ petition dismissed in default.
Writ petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
M/S OPAL IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel, Indirect Taxes, Department of Revenue. Mr. Anubhav Ray, Jr. Standing Counsel for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 07.05.2018
None appear for the petitioner in spite of the second call. Counsel for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence states that the goods have been seized and order of provisional release has already been passed on 21st September, 2017.
Writ petition is dismissed in default.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
MAY 07, 2018 MR/pk
M/s Opal Impex Private Limited
The Commissioner of Customs (Export)
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
