Deepak v. UOI & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner conceded lack of locus standi. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to proceed if permissible under law.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate proceedings as permissible under law.
What the court decided
$~39
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 5202/2018 & C.M. No.20179/2018 DEEPAK ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vijay Sansanwal, Adv.
versus
| UOI & ORS | ..... Respondents | |
|---|---|---|
| Through: | Mr.Prasanta Varma with Ms.Prativa Varma & Ms.Shalu Goswami, Advs. for R-1. |
|
| Mr.Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-2. | ||
| Mr.S.K. Mittal with Mr.Kshitij Mittal, Advs. for R-3. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 18.05.2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner concedes that the petitioner is not directly affected by the action of the respondents and he therefore, may not have locus to challenge the same by way of a writ petition. He however, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to take appropriate proceedings as permissible under law.
The petition and pending application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Deepak
- respondent
UOI
Coram
Rekha Palli
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court