The petitioner sought a direction for expeditious disposal of land revenue proceedings. The respondent counsel undertook disposal within six months, leading the petitioner to withdraw the prayer. The petition was disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sameer Vashisht, ASC
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI.
O R D E R % 18.05.2018
Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the SDM/Revenue Assistant, Narela to decide the proceedings in Case No.1943/RA/N/08 titled as Gaon Sabha vs. Indira Ahuja in an expeditious manner. This Court is not inclined to pass any directions to the Revenue Assistant in view of fact that there is a complete hierarchy provided in the Delhi Land Reforms Act and Delhi Land Revenue Act, to which resort can be made by the petitioner.
At this stage, Mr.Sameer Vashisht, Advocate, who appears on advance notice for the respondents, submits that he has instructions to state that the Revenue Assistant will dispose off the pending proceedings in an expeditious manner and in any case in a period of 6 months from today.
In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the
present petition.
The petition is disposed of as not pressed. The pending applications also stand disposed of.
REKHA PALLI, J
MAY 18, 2018 gm
INDIRA AHUJA
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
REKHA PALLI
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
