Writ petition was dismissed in default as the petitioner failed to appear despite the second call. Goods had been seized and an order of provisional release was already passed.
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed in default for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
AHUJA OVERSEAS ..... Petitioner
Through: Nemo.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel, Indirect Taxes, Department of Revenue. Mr. Anubhav Ray, Jr. Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Counsel for Customs with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 07.05.2018
None appear for the petitioner in spite of the second call. Counsel for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence states that the goods have been seized and order of provisional release has already been passed on 21st September, 2017.
Writ petition is dismissed in default.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
MAY 07, 2018 MR/pk
AHUJA OVERSEAS
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT)
SANJIV KHANNA
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
