The High Court of Delhi granted leave to withdraw the appeal instituted by K M Tomar against a judgment of December 8, 2016, keeping liberty to institute a review petition, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw appeal with liberty to institute review petition granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Through Mr. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal, Mr. Amit Prakash Shahi and Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advocates.
versus STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajiv Kapur, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 03.11.2017
After some arguments, Mr. K.C. Mittal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to institute a review petition in accordance with law, on the assertion that there is an error of fact apparent on the face of the record, in relation to the impugned judgment dated 8th December, 2016.
Leave and liberty granted.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed off accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed off.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2017/ rs
K M Tomar
State Bank of India
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
