Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The Court granted the liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted with liberty to approach the DRT.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
ANIL KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. P. Bhattacharya, Advocate along with Mr. Yashraj Singh, Advocate.
versus
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to initiate an appropriate application in accordance with law before the learned DRT where the proceedings are stated to be pending.
Liberty as prayed for is granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2017 ss
Anil Kumar Jain
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Limited
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
