Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a civil appeal before Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal with liberty to challenge an order. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
versus M/S HARGOBIND FASHIONS PVT LTD AND ORS ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA
Mr. Shiv K. Tyagi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law including assailing the impugned order dated 01.06.2017 passed by DRT-I, before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 03, 2017 js
State Bank of India
M/S Hargobind Fashions Pvt Ltd
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
