The Single Bench dismissed the appeal as it was not pressed. The appellant offered a condition to withdraw if specific objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act were resolved.
Appeal and pending applications dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
SURESH SHAH ..... Appellant Through: Mr Vikas Dhawan and Mr Niranjan Behera, Mr Vanya Khanna and Ms Sukriti Gandhi, Advs.
versus
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv with Mr Munindra Dvivedi, Ms Divya Bhalla and Ms Tanya Chanda, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R % 28.11.2017
Mr Dhawan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, after some arguments, states that he would not press this appeal, if the respondent were to secure his interest, in the event the objections under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, instituted by them, assailing the impugned Award dated 16.12.2016, were to succeed.
Mr Suhail Dutt, learned Senior Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent, states that, in the event, the objections filed by the appellant herein, are upheld and the impugned Award is set aside, they would secure the appellant, if so directed by the learned Single Judge, whilst disposing off the said objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Directed accordingly.
Needless to state that we have not expressed any opinion on the relative merits of the contentions as urged by counsel for the parties in the present appeal.
The appeal along with the pending applications are dismissed as not pressed, and disposed off accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 28, 2017 bg
Suresh Shah
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
