In this letter patent appeal regarding pension disbursement, the court directed respondents to continue disbursing 50% of last drawn salary as pension without qualifying service requirement and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Order to continue disbursement of pension in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
versus THE EDUCATION OFFICER AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 5/DOE. Mr. C. Bheemanna & Mr. Tadimalla Baskar Gowtham, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R
% 28.11.2017
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents states that the appellant is being disbursed the pension, in accordance with law i.e. 50% of the salary last drawn, without any requirement of qualifying service.
The respondents undertake to continue to disburse the pension to the appellant, in accordance with law.
Directed accordingly.
No further directions are called for.
The appeal is disposed off accordingly.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 28, 2017/ rs
N Annapurna
The Education Officer
Siddarth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
