Allowed

Creative Consortium v. Air Force Naval House Board & Anr.

Delhi HC1 Dec 2017FAO(OS)/59/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Acting Chief Justice set aside and quashed a Single Judge's order allowing a respondents' OMP passed in the absence of the appellant's counsel due to bona fide non-appearance. The matter was remanded for fresh hearing. The connected application was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The order dated 25th November, 2016 allowing OMP No.349/2008 was set aside and quashed. The matter was remanded to the ld. Single Judge for fresh hearing on 18th December, 2017.

Creative Consortium Vs Air Force Naval House Board & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2017)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- FAO(OS) 59/2017 & CM No.7904/2017

¶4

CREATIVE CONSORTIUM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arjun Sehgal, Adv.

¶5

Versus

¶6

AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSE BOARD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivekanand, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R

01.12.2017

This appeal assails the order dated 25^th November, 2016 passed by the ld. Single Judge allowing the OMP No.349/2008 which was filed by the respondents herein under Section 31(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 assailing the award dated 27^th March, 2008 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal in favour of the appellant herein.

¶12

The ground on which the appeal is primarily pressed on the fact that the matter was placed in final category on 13^th April, 2009 for argument and the matter remained there for several years.

¶13

Learned counsel for the appellant herein submits that on 25^th November, 2016 he was watching till item No.105 reached. However, he was under the bona fide impression that OMP No.349/2008 would not reach that day and failed to keep track of FAO(OS) No.59/2017 Pg.1 of 3

¶14

the matter. As a result, ld. Single Judge proceeded with the matter and OMP No.349/2008 was taken up and allowed in favour of the respondent herein.

¶15

Be that as it may, in view of the aforesaid bona fide expectation of the ld. counsel for the appellant that the matter would not reach, he was not present when the matter was taken up and the said order dated 25^th November, 2016 was passed in favour of the respondent herein.

¶16

It appears that ld. counsel for the appellant herein overlooked the fact that effectively the matter was at serial No.4 so far as the hearing on 25^th November, 2016 is concerned.

¶17

We are satisfied that that the non-appearance on behalf of the appellant on 25^th November, 2016 was neither deliberate nor mala fide . Explanation tendered by the ld. counsel for the appellant is also reasonable and we accept the same. 7. In view of the above, the order dated 25^th November, 2016 passed by the ld. Single Judge in OMP No.349/2008 is hereby set aside and quashed.

¶18

The matter is remanded back to the ld. Single Judge and the same be listed before the appropriate roster bench on 18^th December, 2017 for directions.

¶19

The parties shall ensure that they shall be represented on the next date of hearing.

¶20

The appeal is allowed in the above terms.

Pg.2 of 3

FAO(OS) No.59/2017

CM No.7904/2017

In view of the above order passed in FAO(OS) No.59/2017, this application does not survive for consideration and the same is accordingly dismissed.

¶25

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

¶26

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶27

DECEMBER 01, 2017 /pmc

¶28

FAO(OS) No.59/2017

¶29

Pg.3 of 3

Creative Consortium v. Air Force Naval House Board & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Creative Consortium v. Air Force Naval House Board & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hansraj Miglani & Ors. Vs Lajwanti Khurana Thr Lr & Ors.

Kyk Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs Vivek Kochher & Anr.

Kuldeep Singh Awla & Anr. Vs Sarjit Singh Awla

Suresh Shah Vs Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.

Samantha Kochhar Vs Pradeep Arora & Ors.

Manjeet Singh & Ors. Vs Narjeet Singh

Crocs Inc. Usa Vs Action Shoes Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Crocs Inc. Usa Vs Bata India Ltd.

Hansraj Miglani & Ors. Vs Lajwanti Khurana Thr Lr & Ors.

Kyk Corporation Limited & Ors. Vs Vivek Kochher & Anr.

Raju Mehra Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation

Residents Welfare Association Vs North Dmc & Ors.

Shadab Husain Khan Vs Union of India and Ors.

Samantha Kochhar Vs Pradeep Arora & Ors.