The High Court of Delhi allowed an application by the appellant for leave to withdraw the accompanying appeal due to a settlement reached between the parties. The appeal and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Application for leave to withdraw accompanied appeal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
ATUL DEWAN
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Anuj Sehgal and Mr. Atul Batra, Advocates
versus
SHALINI KUMAR AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA O R D E R
% 14.11.2017
C.M. No.41068/2017
The present application under the provisions of Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been instituted on behalf of the applicant/appellant seeking leave to withdraw the accompanying appeal, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.
Notice.
Mr. Dinesh Garg, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the nonapplicants/respondents and affirms the statement made on behalf of the applicant/appellant.
In view of the foregoing, the present application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.
FAO(OS) 286/2016
Page 1 of 2
FAO (OS) 286/2016 & C.M. No.36896/2016 (Stay)
In view of order passed in C.M. No.41068/2017, as above, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. Pending application also stands disposed of.
The date already fixed i.e. 20.11.2017 stands cancelled.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
DEEPA SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2017 dn
FAO(OS) 286/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to withdraw the accompanying appeal due to a settlement between parties should be allowed under Order XXIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the CPC.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Atul Dewan
Shalini Kumar and Ors
Siddharth Mridul
Deepa Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
