Md. Imtiaz v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner failed to appear or take steps for service of summons to the respondent police officer despite multiple fixed dates. The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
$~12
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 5135/2015 & CRL.M.A. 18508/2015
MD. IMTIAZ ..... Petitioner
Through: None. versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for State with SI Ram Avtar, PS Chandni Mahal.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
- O R D E R
% 11.12.2017
No steps have been taken by the petitioner in terms of order dated 19.07.2017 qua the service of the respondent no. 2 for the date fixed.
No steps had ever been taken by the petitioner since the date 18.12.2015, when the petition was taken up for hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MD. IMTIAZ
- respondent
STATE
Coram
ANU MALHOTRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court