In a bail application, the petitioner's lawyer submitted that the underlying FIRs were quashed in a related judgment dated 28.11.2013. The Court accepted this and disposed of the application as infructuous without hearing the State side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
| * | IN THE HIGH COURT O | F DELHI AT NEW DELHI |
|---|---|---|
| + | BAIL APPLN. 1780/2017 AMBIKA JOSHI |
..... Petitioner |
| Through: versus |
Mr. Rahul Bora & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates. |
|
| THE STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Through: | Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for | |
| State with SI Yogesh Kumar, PS Roop Nagar. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R % 11.12.2017
It has been submitted on behalf of the State that the FIR no. 397/2014, PS Roop Nagar u/s 420/468/471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 has since been quashed which is also brought forth through the copy of the judgment dated 28.11.2017 in W.P. Crl. 3265/2017 and CRL.M.C. 4811/2017 of this court indicating that the FIRs no. 99/2013, PS Sabzi Mandi dated 20.05.2013 under Sections 354/506/509/323/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and FIR no. 397/2014 dated 21.09.2014 under Section 420/468/471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 , PS Roop Nagar have been quashed.
In view thereof, the petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
DECEMBER 11, 2017/ Neha Chopra
Ambika Joshi
The State
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
