Subhash Gupta v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court reduced the surety amount for furlough from Rs.10,000 to Rs.5,000 after the petitioner could not furnish the original amount, leaving other conditions intact.
What did the court decide?
The surety amount was reduced from Rs.10,000 to Rs.5,000, with all other furlough conditions remaining unchanged.
What the court decided
$~43
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 5111/2017
SUBHASH GUPTA
..... Petitioner Through Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
- % 08.12.2017
Parole/Furlough guidelines 2010 issued by order No.F.18/912009/HG dated 17.2.2010 issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi have been submitted on behalf of the State which indicate that while Clause-31 thereof it would be open to the competent authority to impose suitable conditions while granting furlough in exceptional cases. While the order dated 1.4.2017 issued from the Office of the Director General of Prisons, Prison Headquarters, Tihar, Janakpuri, New Delhi, the petitioner has been allowed to be granted the first spell of Furlough for a period of three weeks subject to the conditions as follow:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subhash Gupta
- respondent
State
Coram
Anu Malhotra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court