The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on the hearing date and expressed lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RATAN DAS ..... Petitioner
Through : None. versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(SOUTH) FOOD & SUPPLIES :GOVERNMENT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Manish Khurana, Adv. for Mr. Sumit Batra, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 22.11.2017
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2017 aj
RATAN DAS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(SOUTH) FOOD & SUPPLIES
C.HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
