This judgment converts a writ petition filed in public interest into a representation and directs respondents to examine the petitioner's assertions and proceed in accordance with law, while expressly reserving opinion on merits.
Direction to respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and examine assertions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision : 21st November, 2017 MOHD. IRFAN KHAN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajeev Saxena, Adv.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Hashmat Nabi and Mr. Abhinav Thareja, Advs. for R-3 with Mr. Qaseem, CLODelhi Wakf Board Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASCGNCTD and Mr. Dhananjai Rana, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.10363/2017 Page 1 of 2
grievance made by the writ petitioner and proceed in the matter in accordance with law.
Dasti .
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J NOVEMBER 21, 2017/ kr
W.P.(C)No.10363/2017 Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to treat the writ petition as a representation and direct respondents to examine assertions according to law.
Mohd. Irfan Khan
Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Gita Mittal
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
