Acting Chief Justice C. Hari Shankar disposed of a writ petition alleging violation of the SPG Act by the respondent. The Court held the petition not maintainable and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~72
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TUHIN A. SINHA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhishek Vikram, Adv.
versus
RAHUL GANDHI AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC for R-2, 3 & 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R
%
22.11.2017
CM No.42415/2017 ( for exemption )
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) No.10388/2017
Pg.1 of 2
W.P.(C) No.10388/2017
This writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2017 /pmc
W.P.(C) No.10388/2017
Pg.2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition alleging violation of the SPG Act is maintainable.
Tuhin A. Sinha
Rahul Gandhi
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
