The Acting Chief Justice treated a public interest writ petition as a representation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and directed respondent nos. 2 to 4 to examine it in accordance with the law without expressing an opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
% Date of decision : 21st November, 2017 MAULANA ANSAR RAZA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, Adv.
versus
FAROOQ ABDULLAH FORMER CHIEF MINISTER & ORS
..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. for R-UOI
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
W.P.(C)No.10357/2017 Page 1 of 2
Dasti .
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 21, 2017/ kr
W.P.(C)No.10357/2017 Page 2 of 2
Maulana Ansar Raza
Farooq Abdullah and others
Gita Mittal
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
